Help For Unique Property Investment Group Victims

Richardson Hartley Law has come across new information to help victims of Unique Property Investment Group.

Many banks were rejecting reimbursement claims for investors who lost money on the basis that it is a civil dispute.

*However, banks have now started to listen to arguments and are now refunding victims under their reimbursement schemes.*

Our investigations uncovered fresh information that we believe means we can successfully bring claims for all of the Unique Property Investment Group victims.

Martin Richardson, a senior partner at Richardson Hartley Law, said: “A lot of investors lost their life savings as a result of Unique Property Investment Group.

“We have said from the beginning that a property investment group that is alleged to have taken in £12m but only has £315,000 in property does not seem right.

“The banks have been fighting back against reimbursement claims saying that they are a civil matter. We refused to accept this and banks have now started to make reimbursements. We also believe the information that we have uncovered will allow us to make successful claims on behalf of a wider range of clients.”

Richardson Hartley Law is able to represent clients on a no win, no fee basis.

Reclaim Money Lost To Unique Property Investment Group

Start Your Claim Now

JavaScript is required to view this form. Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.

Richardson Hartley Law has been investigating Unique Property Investment Group for a number of months.

As well as looking into the company we have been examining the actions of the banks.

We are unable to disclose precise details at the moment but we believe that the information we have uncovered will be essential in helping victims of Unique Property Investment Group to successfully recover their money.

As we continue to gather evidence we are keen to hear from all Unique Property Investment Group investors.

Aside from our own investigation findings, the administrator’s report raises serious questions about the investment firm.

The report showed that while the company had taken in more than £12m it only had £315,000 of property assets.

We do not believe that it is realistic that investors are going to recoup any significant funds via the administration process.